Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans, PNAS January 27, 2015. 112 (4) 1036-1040, by Wu Youyou, Michal Kosinski and David Stillwell was one of the building blocks for the development of products and services sold to clients by firms like Cambridge Analytica. The study compares the accuracy of personality judgment —- a ubiquitous and important social-cognitive activity —- between computer models and humans. Using several criteria, the authors show that computers’ judgments of people’s personalities based on their digital footprints are more accurate and valid than judgments made by their close others or acquaintances (friends, family, spouse, colleagues, etc.). The study’s findings highlight that people’s personalities can be predicted automatically and without involving human social-cognitive skills. — Joe
- Judicial Conflicts and Voting Agreement: Evidence from Interruptions at Oral Argument
- The New Oral Argument: Justices as Advocates
- CRS Report: Congress Considers Possible Responses to the Disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi
- Tracking Trump’s Approval in All 50 States
- Appeals Court Rules Georgia’s Laws (Including Annotations) Are Not Protected By Copyright
- Monitoring press freedom abuses in the US: The US Press Freedom Tracker
- Reynen Court’s services automation platform seeks to standardize BigLaw needs for legal software
- Presidential Norms and Article II
- What can lawyers learn — or should learn — from data visualization?
- Does Fastcase have the largest user population?
Just in case you don't get it: The views expressed are solely those of the blog post author and should not be attributed to anyone else, meaning they do not necessarily represent the views of any organization that the post author is affiliated with or with the views of any other author who publishes on this blog.
- 174,629 hits