The Federal District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the DACA recission was “arbitrary and capricious” because the Department of Homeland Security failed to “adequately explain its conclusion that the program was unlawful.” The ruling requires that immigration officials “accept and process new as well as renewal DACA applications” if the administration “cannot better explain its view that DACA is unlawful” within a 90-day stay period. Here’s the text of the decision. — Joe
Authors
Categories
Archives
Recent Posts
- Blockchains are getting hacked
- Teaching Law Students Media Literacy in the Fake News Era
- The Case for an ABA Accreditation Standard on Employment Outcomes
- ACLU Challenges National Emergency Declaration; Read the complaint
- Scientific Methods for Analyzing Original Meaning: Corpus Linguistics and the Emoluments Clauses
- US News to create scholarly impact ranking for law schools
- 16 States File Lawsuit over Trump’s Emergency Declaration; Read the Complaint
- Lexical Ordering in Statutory Interpretation
- Trump Ranked Third Worst President
- Series of Blockchain White Papers Published by Lex Mundi
Disclaimer
Just in case you don't get it: The views expressed are solely those of the blog post author and should not be attributed to anyone else, meaning they do not necessarily represent the views of any organization that the post author is affiliated with or with the views of any other author who publishes on this blog.
Blog Stats
- 198,606 hits