Here’s the abstract for Jeffrey J. Rachlinski’s The Politics of Legal Empirics: Do Political Attitudes Predict the Results of Empirical Legal Scholarship? (2018): “Empirical legal scholarship has emerged as a dominant trend in legal scholarship. At its best, empirical scholarship subjects assertions about the effect of legal rules to a neutral test. But is empirical inquiry truly neutral? The validity of an empirical study should rest on the reliability of the methods used, rather than the political implications of its conclusions. Scholars might choose targets of inquiry, sources of data, or methods of analysis that support their political allegiances. This paper tests this thesis by matching the political beliefs of authors of empirical legal scholarship with the results of their research. The political allegiances of authors mildly correlate with the results of empirical inquiry in legal scholarship.” — Joe
- PACER Attacked as ‘Judicially Approved Scam’
- Who is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez?
- What constitutes judicial influence and how should it be measured?
- CRS Report: Arms Control and Nonproliferation: A Catalog of Treaties and Agreements
- Special Counsel Prosecutors Started Investigating Michael Cohen in July 2017; Read the Documents Related to Search Warrant
- Global Data Privacy: The EU Way
- Border Wall: Read Trump’s Veto Message for H.J. Res. 46
- Feliú on Moreau Lislet: The Man Behind the Digest of 1808
- Public draft of Updated Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices 3d ed. Released for Comment
- Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts Publishes 2018 Federal Caseload Data
Just in case you don't get it: The views expressed are solely those of the blog post author and should not be attributed to anyone else, meaning they do not necessarily represent the views of any organization that the post author is affiliated with or with the views of any other author who publishes on this blog.
- 203,366 hits