One of the most important, impactful decisions a president makes is nominating someone to the Supreme Court. How does that issue play out in election campaigns. Christopher Schmidt characterizes this as the forgotten issue in the 2016 president election campaign. From the abstract for Schmidt’s The Forgotten Issue? The Supreme Court and the 2016 Presidential Campaign, 93 Chicago-Kent Law Review ___ 2018:
This Article considers how presidential candidates use the Supreme Court as an issue in their election campaigns. I focus in particular on 2016, but I try to make sense of this extraordinary election by placing it in the context of presidential elections over the past century. In the presidential election of 2016, circumstances seemed perfectly aligned to force the Supreme Court to the front of public debate, but neither Donald Trump nor Hillary Clinton treated the Court as a central issue of their campaigns. Trump rarely went beyond a brief mention of the Court in his campaign speeches; Clinton basically avoided the issue as much as possible throughout the general election. The candidates’ relative lack of attention to the Court can partly be explained by factors unique to the 2016 campaign. Yet historically the Court has rarely been a major concern for presidential candidates. It was not until the 1960s that major-party presi-dential candidates even considered the Supreme Court as an issue appropri-ate for presidential campaigns, and since then candidates have been reluctant to press future appointments to the Court as a centerpiece of their election efforts. The 2016 campaign, for all its precedent-shattering and unpredictable qualities, basically fell into a predictable dynamic when it came to the candidates’ treatment of the Court.