In The Plot to Subvert an Election the New York Times “trace[s] the major plotlines of the Russian attack is to underscore what we now know with certainty: The Russians carried out a landmark intervention that will be examined for decades to come. Acting on the personal animus of Mr. Putin, public and private instruments of Russian power moved with daring and skill to harness the currents of American politics. Well-connected Russians worked aggressively to recruit or influence people inside the Trump campaign.” See also the New York Times companion piece, A Timeline Showing the Full Scale of Russia’s Unprecedented Interference in the 2016 Election, and Its Aftermath.
- FTC on Tying the Sale of Two Products
- A Study on the Unionization of Academic Law Libraries
- New 8th Edition of National Survey of State Law Includes 10 New Chapters
- The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Dilemma
- Can Legal Citations Be Stylish?
- CRS Report: Frequently Asked Questions about the Julian Assange Charges
- The 2019 Am Law 100 Now Available
- AALL Announces 2019 Product of the Year Award
- Niedringhaus Reviews Hellyer’s Evaluating Shepard’s, KeyCite, and BCite for Case Validation Accuracy
- Solum on the Conceptual Structure of Originalism and Living Constitutionalism
Just in case you don't get it: The views expressed are solely those of the blog post author and should not be attributed to anyone else, meaning they do not necessarily represent the views of any organization that the post author is affiliated with or with the views of any other author who publishes on this blog.
- 208,672 hits